Imagine two friends leaving an exhibition together. They are still discussing something they have seen when the corridor narrows beside a freestanding sign. One moves ahead of the other. A little further on, they find room to walk alongside each other again.

They can both reach the exit. The route appears to work.

But what happened to their conversation along the way?

On a floor plan, the journey might be represented by a single arrow. It passes through the corridor, turns a corner and reaches the door. There is little reason to question it.

Two friends become separated into single file where a freestanding sign narrows a gallery passage.
A small obstruction changes how two people move together.
A simple gallery floor plan shows a route to the exit, alongside a small perspective of two people at a narrowed passage.
A circulation arrow records the route, but not everything happening along it.

Now consider that journey when the friends are communicating in sign language.

They need to see each other’s hands and expressions. Walking one behind the other changes what they can see. Looking towards a companion also means sharing attention between the conversation and the route ahead.

Suddenly, the space around that arrow matters differently.

Would a wider corridor resolve it?

It might help. But imagine arriving at a corner where approaching people are hidden from view, or turning towards a bright window behind a companion’s face. The width has not changed, yet the conversation may still become harder to follow.

Two friends walk alongside one another while signing, with dashed lines showing their mutual view.
Hands, expressions and the route ahead all need attention.
Two corridor studies show a blind corner and a bright window behind a person signing.
More width alone does not resolve a hidden corner or strong backlighting.

This is where an apparently simple circulation problem becomes more interesting. The decisions about the corridor, its corners and its lighting need to be considered together.

At Gallaudet University in Washington, D.C., these relationships have received sustained attention. In 2005, architect Hansel Bauman partnered with the university’s ASL and Deaf Studies programmes to develop the DeafSpace Project, drawing architectural guidance from Deaf experience. Project history

An axonometric corridor study brings together passage width, a visible turning point and softened daylight.
Width, corners and light form one spatial experience.
Deaf participants and an architect discuss a corridor model around an accessible table in an illustrative workshop.
Design knowledge can begin with people’s lived experience. This is a fictional co-design scene, not a depiction of an actual Gallaudet meeting.

Gallaudet describes how people signing while walking often maintain more space between them for visual communication, shifting their gaze between one another and their surroundings. Its guidance also addresses glare, backlighting and sightlines. DeafSpace principles

The question now extends beyond how much space a corridor needs.

What should people be able to continue doing while moving through it?

A conversation can begin in a gallery and continue towards the entrance. It does not necessarily end at the gallery door. Yet when rooms and circulation are designed separately, that continuity can be easy to overlook.

A perspective study shows two signing friends, mutual sightlines and awareness of the path ahead.
Visual communication shares attention with the surrounding route.
A sequence follows two friends communicating from an exhibition room through its doorway towards the entrance.
An activity can continue beyond the room where it began.

For an architect, this suggests a useful step before fixing the plan: follow the journey with the people who will use it. Notice where they change position, where their attention shifts and where they need to pause. Then ask which decisions about space or light could make a difference.

There will be tradeoffs involving privacy, daylight and available area. Deaf people also have different needs and preferences. The response should develop through consultation, rather than treating one layout as an answer for everyone.

Two users and an architect walk a gallery route, pausing to discuss a corner and a freestanding sign.
A walkthrough reveals where people adjust, pause or lose sight of one another.
An axonometric design sketch explores screening, softened daylight and shared circulation space.
Privacy, light and available space need to be considered together.

This is where TheeAe’s Design Beyond Form movement finds its starting point. The experience helps explain what the architecture needs to do. From there, its arrangement can begin to take shape.

Return to the two friends leaving the exhibition.

Reaching the exit is still important. But the journey also holds the possibility of sharing an observation, asking another question or understanding something together.

When reviewing that corridor, would the design notice if their conversation had to stop?

A sketch sequence moves from two people communicating to a route diagram and an emerging gallery layout.
Begin with the activity, then develop the spatial arrangement.
The two friends walk together towards the gallery exit, remaining able to see one another.
Reaching the exit is one part of the journey. This shows a design possibility, not a proven before-and-after outcome.

Source note: This draws on established, community-informed design guidance, not a study proving stronger social relationships. The opening is an imagined situation.

All illustrations are fictional concepts, not actual Gallaudet buildings or instructional sign-language diagrams.

Related Picks

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

A printed copy of Design Beyond Form by Chris Woohyun Cho

Design Beyond Form by Chris Woohyun Cho — View on Amazon (paid link)

A closer look at architecture shaped by people, place and everyday life—through the questions and experiences behind the design.

Further Reading

DeafSpace — Gallaudet University

Free official resource · non-affiliate

Gallaudet’s introduction connects visual communication with space, movement, light, colour and acoustics. It is a stronger starting point than treating inclusive design as a collection of individual products.

Explore DeafSpace

Related Articles

The Shops Are Close. Why Does the Walk Still Feel Difficult? Headline above a conceptual illustration of an older woman at her doorway looking toward shaded neighbourhood shops.

The Shops Are Close. Why Does the Walk Still Feel Difficult?

A clear route is only part of an accessible journey. Explore how places to rest and sit with a companion can support everyday movement and conversation.

Read the article →

Masari Walk concept showing an elevated pedestrian route through a waterfront city.

Why Walking Might Be the Most Powerful Idea We Forgot — And How It Can Change Dubai

Take the question of walking and talking from the corridor to the city, with a reflection on shared routes, encounters and the Masari Walk concept.

Read the article →